Leonardo Siguencia Oral Rehabilitator
Karla Vallejo Oral Rehabilitator, Paul Cerda Periodontist, Marco Medina Periodontist.
SUMMARY
Most of
the dental treatments that are performed today is aesthetically since most
patients need an improvement in their quality of life and self-esteem,
therefore, great importance has been given to the smile as a fundamental factor
of said wellness.
Patient
male 33-year-old, who came to the consultation with the desire to improve his
smile, because he has a cleft palate that was operated on years before surgery,
and orthodontic treatments themselves that led to loss of insertion of pieces
11, 12, 21, 22. The objective of the present clinical case is to perform a
treatment between the periodontist and the oral rehabilitator in order to
restore function and aesthetics to the upper anterior parts (11, 12, 13, 21,
22, 23, 24) and improving the patient’s smile.
Objective: To carry out a
multidisciplinary treatment between the Periodontist and the Oral Rehabilitator,
in a patient with cleft palate; in such a way that there is a work protocol
which leads to a correct execution of the treatment which benefits the patient.
Conclusions: With this type of
multidisciplinary treatment, the functional and, above all, aesthetic part of
the patient was improved, while the quality of life of the patient with cleft
palate was very good.
Key words: Cracked palate, connective
graft, particulate bone graft, implants.
INTRODUCTION
The
deformities that we can observe of the cleft lip and palate are among the most
common congenital anomalies of the face and palate. (1)
Cleft
lip and / or cleft palate (CLP) is a more common or frequent congenital craniofacial
anomaly, with a prevalence of 9.92 per 10,000 live births in Italy. The
treatment for this anomaly requires multidisciplinary treatments in which there
must be a correct communication between: maxillofacial surgeons, orthodontists,
oral surgeons, prosthodontists, otorhinolaryngologists, speech and language
pathologists, neurologists and psychologists are involved. (2)
The
most important for a functional restoration of the masticatory system is the
surgical closure of the cleft lip and palate. To achieve success, early
reconstruction of a normal anatomy is necessary to allow the normal and
physiological growth of the structures of the middle third of the face and
allow children to develop unaltered chewing, speech, hearing and aesthetics
and, therefore, qualities psychological and social (3)
The
treatment of patients with cleft palate depends on the severity of the cleft,
as well as early correction of this anomaly. The types of bone graft with
cortical and cancellous bone taken from the ilium are recognized as the most
effective for closing oronasal communication. After closure, patients with
cleft palate often have missing teeth, often including the lateral incisor.
The use of dental implants placed on the grafted alveolar ridge is accepted as a viable method for dental reconstruction. (4)
CASE REPORT
A 33-year-old patient with good health status does not report any illness. He attended the Periodontics Postgraduate Clinic of the School of Dentistry of the Central University of Ecuador, with the purpose of the consultation: “I want to fix my teeth, because I do not like my smile “prior to the clinical examination, we had the informed consent of the patient for the registration of the present case. Once the patient went through the graduate program of Periodontics, he was referred to the Rehabilitation Program of the same institution, since he did not feel well with his teeth. Previously, he was sent to take panoramic and periapical radiographs (Fig.1 A), after which we proceeded to take intra (Fig.1 B) and extra oral photographs (Fig.2)
Once obtained that, we focused on the taking of impressions to later obtain the models of studies that would be mounted in the Articulator and then make the waxing with its respective planning on implants.
The first surgery consisted in the placement of connective tissue that was obtained from the palate of the patient (Fig. 3 A – B) then this same tissue was placed in the sector of the anterior superior teeth.
After the first surgery a month and a half weeks ago, the incisors were removed, and within a week of performing this procedure, a provisional Acrylic (tooth color) was made in order to give the patient some aesthetics, it must be emphasized that the provisional was left without contact with the tissue. (Fig. 4)
After 5 months, a second surgery was performed, which consisted in the placement of 2 implants (Mis – Israel) of 3.75 x 10 mm internal hexagon, (Fig. 5) which at the platform level were filled with bone particulate (Bioinnovation – Brazil) because it presented a slight space between socket and implant. (Fig. 5) It was also left with provisional to the second week of surgery without contact with soft tissue.
In the seventh month of having performed the placement of the implants, a third surgery of connective tissue placement was performed, due to the fact that there was a resorption, for this the connective tissue that was placed where the defect was located was removed from the patient’s palate (Fig. 6 and 7).
From the eighth month we proceeded to carve the pieces 13, 23, and 24 and to make impression of the implants for this we use angulated attachments (multiunit) the same that allowed us to correct the inclination of the implants, then the laboratory sent a test in acrylic resin (duralay) the same that allowed to verify a correct settlement of the structure together with this test was sent 3 crowns of lithium discilicate (E max) which were tested in parts 13, 23, 24 (Fig. .8). Then the duralay structure was cast by the laboratory technician (Fig. 9) to perform once again the settlement of the metal structure. (5)
Once the tests were done, they were sent to the laboratory so that they could finish the work. After that, the crowns were cemented and the ceramic metal structure was screwed on implants (Fig. 10), then panoramic and periapical radiographs were taken. to observe the correct settlement of the structure on implants and crowns. (Fig. 11 A – B).
At the end of the patient’s treatment, it is recommended to use a stabilization splint so that there is no overload problem in the lower parts (Fig. 12).
After
the treatment, the photographs were taken and the patient was treated before
and after the treatment.
Patient lips at rest a better disposition of the lips is observed (Fig. 13 A – B)
Patient in smile shows a curvature of his broad smile according to his facial profile (Fig. 14 A – B).
In a profile picture, one can see the patient’s lips at rest (Fig. 15) and another image of the patient’s smile in profile (Fig. 16).
Another intra-oral image of the patient can be seen before and after the treatment (Fig. 17)
Finally an occlusal view of the patient’s upper arch before and after it (Fig. 18).
DISCUSSION
The
literature tells us of a good prognosis when using implants in patients with
cleft palate, likewise the survival rate according to Gomes indicates that it
is 95% during the first 5 years all this will depend on the care of the patient
and the patient’s hygiene as referred to Papi P in 2015. 1,2
In the
present article, the patient’s own connective tissue graft was placed, at the
same time, bovine xenoingetum, obtaining good results, based on the article by
N. Niez (6) which indicates that the degree of resorption of the bone grafts.
it is 3.5% horizontally and 2.7% vertically. Another author Russell (7) reports
that graft after surgery has many reported benefits, including periodontal
support for teeth adjacent to the cleft, this provides a correct disposition of
the tissues when planning some type of rehabilitation. 6.7.
Subsequent
to the placement of the grafts, we proceeded to the placement of the implants,
which had a torque of 35 N, which is considered a correct primary
stabilization. The use of dental implants as an alternative in this type of
patients has a good prognosis. This is what Vecchiatini R 4 refers to, which
indicates that implants have many advantages: they provide good support for the
dental prosthesis, an excellent aesthetic result, the preservation of healthy
adjacent teeth and the prevention of resorption of the grafted bone. 4
Those
patients who were treated with xenoinjects showed good stability during the
first 7 years with a success rate of 88 to 93% according to Mônica Diuana (8)
In the
dental pieces lithium discilicate crowns were made in that this material has
good compatibility in the functional and aesthetic aspect of the patient, also
because of the age of the same this treatment was ideal, this agrees with Toman
(9) in a study In vivo 9-year follow-up which concluded that the survival rate
of this type of material is 87.1%. 9
CONCLUSIONS
With
this type of multidisciplinary treatment the aesthetic and functional part will
be improved, but above all the quality of life of the patients with cleft
palate.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
1. Gomes KU, Martins WDB, Ribas MdO.
Horizontal and vertical maxillary osteotomy stability, in cleft lip and palate
patients, using allogeneic bone graft. Dental press journal of orthodontics.
2013;18(5):84-90.
2. Papi P, Giardino R, Sassano P,
Amodeo G, Pompa G, Cascone P. Oral health related quality of life in cleft lip
and palate patients rehabilitated with conventional prostheses or dental
implants. Journal of International Society of Preventive & Community
Dentistry. 2015;5(6):482.
3. Wermker K, Jung S, Joos U,
Kleinheinz J. Dental implants in cleft lip, alveolus, and palate patients: a
systematic review. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants.
2014;29(2).
4. Vecchiatini R, Mobilio N, Raimondi
F, Catapano S, Calura G. Implant-prosthetic rehabilitation for a patient with
monolateral cleft lip and palate: a clinical report. Quintessence
International. 2009;40(6).
5. Gatti C, Chiapasco M, Casentini P,
Procopio C. Manual ilustrado de implantologia oral: diagnostico, cirugia y
protesis: Amolca (Actualidades Medico Odontologicas Latinoamericanas); 2010.
6. Niez N, Nham K, Vi-Fane B.
Description of transverse maxillary expansion in patients with bilateral cleft
lip and palate undergoing gingivoperiosteoplasty with alveolar bone graft. A
preliminary study. Journal of Dentofacial Anomalies and Orthodontics.
2015;18(1):108.
7. Russell K, Long Jr RE,
Daskalogiannakis J, Mercado A, Hathaway R, Semb G, et al. A multicenter study
using the SWAG scale to compare secondary alveolar bone graft outcomes for
patients with cleft lip and palate. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal.
2016;53(2):180-6.
8. Calasans‐Maia MD, Mourão CFdA,
Alves ATNN, Sartoretto SC, de Uzeda MJP, Granjeiro JM. Maxillary sinus
augmentation with a new xenograft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical
implant dentistry and related research. 2015;17:e586-e93.
9. Toman M,
Toksavul S. Clinical evaluation of 121 lithium disilicate all-ceramic crowns up
to 9 years. Quintessence International. 2015;46(3).